RGUHS Nat. J. Pub. Heal. Sci Vol: 14 Issue: 4 eISSN: pISSN
Dear Authors,
We invite you to watch this comprehensive video guide on the process of submitting your article online. This video will provide you with step-by-step instructions to ensure a smooth and successful submission.
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.
Arathi S Nair1 , Manjusha Nambiar2 , Rony T Kondody3*, Sudhir Rama Varma4 , Akash Shaju5 , Rhea Mathew1
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore.
2 Department of Periodontics, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore.
3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore.
4 Department of Clinical Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.
5 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding author:
Dr. Rony T Kondody, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore. E-mail: ronykondody55@gmail.com
Abstract
The novel Coronavirus disease 2019, has led to a global pandemic at a scale that was not experienced by the human race for several decades. The evidence suggests that respiratory droplets are the common route of transmission for Coronavirus. Several public health agencies have recommended the wearing of masks in public settings to curtail the virus spread. Regardless of the debates in the medical community and the global mask availability shortage, more countries and regions are moving forward with recommendations or mandates to wear masks in public. However, as a result of extended use, reuse, and reprocessing of single-use masks and respirators, several dermatological, psychological and other health hazards are being increasingly reported. This review aims to comprehensively assess the various ill-effects of long-term use of facemask in the general population.
Keywords
Downloads
-
1FullTextPDF
Article
Introduction
The World Health Organization has declared SARS COVID-19 as a global health crisis, resulting in major disruptions, national emergencies, and lockdowns, with only essential services remaining operational. The origin of the pneumonia-like infection of unknown cause is believed to be from bats, and the infection was first detected in the city of Wuhan in Hubei province, China. The virus spreads primarily through respiratory secretions and droplets, as well as direct contact, through which the virus enters the mucous membranes.1-3
In the absence of effective drugs and medical facilities, many measures were used to reduce the burden of disease and to avoid exhausting limited hospital resources. Wearing masks is considered to be one of the non-pharmaceutical intervention measures that could be implemented, without significantly disrupting social practices.4,5
With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, facemasks have become an integral part of our everyday life. Apart from the inconvenience associated with its use, the prolonged use of mouth masks comes with a plethora of problems like physical as well as psychological deterioration along with various other symptoms because of their consistent and recurrent use, collectively called the “Mask Induced Exhaustion Syndrome.”6 As the state of infection still prevails, there have been simultaneous calls for a more nuanced approach within the medical fraternity, as well as users and observers of medical devices.7
According to the study by Lim et al., various side effects like headaches and associated conditions were observed as a result of long term use of face masks,8 while a study by Foo, et al., showed adverse skin reactions from mask use in the general population.9 Continuous pressure created by the use of personal protective equipment and mask could result in the breakdown of the skin as well as cause damage to the bridge of the nose and cheekbones that could be attributed to the usage of masks and eyewear.10
While there have been continuous debates about the pros and cons of wearing masks in public places around the world, it has become the new social norm in many countries at the same time. Considering various facts, it is important to understand long-term health and psychological hazards that could be created by the overuse of facemasks. Therefore, this review focused to understand various side effects associated with the longterm use of facemasks in the general population.
Standardization and Classification of Facemask
Respiratory masks are safety shields that cover a part of the face and protect the wearer from environmental pollutants and exposure to airborne infections. Medical or surgical masks in Europe are usually graded by three levels of Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE1, BFE2, and Type R), whereas in the US, grading is done about fluid protection recommended by ASTM regulations.11 The American Society for Testing and Standard Specification (ASTM) has evaluated masks based on four main categories.12
• Fluid resistance––is the ability to resist the entry of blood particles or any body fluids.
• Filtration efficiency: This is further categorized into BFE where bacterial particles are filtered (0.3 microns).
• Breathability: This is categorized by the ability of the operator to breathe easily; it is normally labeled on the mask as Delta P; it denotes the pressure drop across a face mask and is expressed as pascal or mm H20/cm2 .
• Flame spread: This measures the flame spread of the mask material. Depending on these four categories, masks can be selected based on the procedures performed.
The available facemasks can be classified as full masks (normed following EN 136) and a half and quarter masks (EN 140). Filtering facepieces (FFP) are labeled as half masks. They resist the entry of microbes via the airway and shield both the mask-wearer and the surrounding people. They are regularly noted as “triple layer mask.”13
Medical mask filtration tests and FFR tests are carried out on a cross-section of the mask and the entire surface of the mask, respectively. As a result, the layers of filtration material and the FFR shape ensure that the FFR’s outer edges seal around the wearer’s face, resulting in guaranteed filtration. Other performance requirements for FFR include staying within specified parameters.14
During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, WHO in 2020 has recommended the regular use of following masks-13
i. Masks for everyday use: Mostly recommended for the general public for everyday usage. This helps in the reduction of viral spread, especially during exhalation (Figure 1). But due to the lack of filtration of minute particles, it cannot be used in health care setup.
ii. MNP (Medical mouth-nose- protection): Also called “triple layer mask”. They have the filtering capability against aerosols (Figure 2). They are affixed to the head with straps that go around the ears or head or both. Their performance is tested according to ASTM F2100, EN 14683, or equivalent that aim to balance filtration, breathability and optionally, fluid penetration resistance.12 These masks consist of three layers of nonwoven fabric. The outer layer helps to repel salivary droplets. The middle layer helps to prevent particles above a certain size from penetrating. The inner layer absorbs the moisture from exhaled air and also helps to trap droplets from the user. These masks can be recommended for routine medical check-ups and treatments.
iii. FFP2-mask (Face Filtering Piece)/N95-mask/ P2 (Figure 3): These masks offer more than 95% of the filtration capacity of airborne pathogens during inhalation.15 These are certified according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 42 CFR 84 protocol. These masks effectively protect as long as there is no exhaling valve.13 Unlike the loose fit surgical mask, it has extra filtration layers that are manufactured to achieve a close facial fit. It also consists of multiple layers and the layer which help in filtration is made of polypropylene with an embedded electrostatic charge. Straps of these masks are composed of thermoplastic elastomer while nose clips are made from aluminium, nose foam from polyurethane, and the shell and cover web are made from polyester material.12 These types of masks are best suited for the health care profession.
iv. FFP3-mask: Most effective mask with the ability to filter more than 99% of particles while inhaling. These masks also help to protect the environment in the absence of an exhaling valve.13 The total inward leakage of these masks is considered to be less than 2%.
Significance of Wearing Facemask
The role of face masks among health care workers and the general public in curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic is huge.16 The potential benefits of mouth masks can be summarized as follows:
• It is a comprehensive strategy to prevent the transmission of the virus through droplet infection which in turn forms a barrier in preventing the spread of infection
• It also protects people caring for COVID-19 patients in non-clinical settings and also makes others aware of their role in preventing the spread of the virus
• Motivates the public regarding the prevention protocols of hand hygiene and also prevents other respiratory illness which will worsen the current situation.17
Table 1 briefly summarises various studies in the literature about the efficacy of face mask use during COVID-19 pandemic.
Pathophysiological Implications Associated with the Use of Protective Facemask
Wearing a mask has numerous advantages, including unquestionable anti-infection properties. However, there are some risks and side effects to consider. This is especially true when it comes to general public use. Based on the design, masks have also been shown to increase dead space within the lungs.13
Facemasks function by increasing resistance to air movement during inhalation.26 Although intermittent and repetitive increase in respiration resistance may be adaptive that could strengthen various muscles of respiration,27 long term use could create ill effects that may create health crisis.26
In normal conditions, air contains 20.93% O2 and 0.03% CO2 , providing partial pressures of 100 mmHg and 40 mmHg for these gases in the arterial blood. The trapped air which is re-breathed repeatedly could lead to hypoxemia and hypercapnia. This could result in cardiopulmonary and neurological complications.28
A low level of oxygen in the blood can cause myocardial ischemia, serious arrhythmias, right or left ventricular dysfunction, dizziness, hypotension, syncope, and pulmonary hypertension, among other things, whereas chronic low-grade hypoxemia and hypercapnia caused by wearing a facemask can aggravate pre-existing medical conditions.28
A bilateral headache was the most common side effect of prolonged face mask use in a study of 158 health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.29 This was reported in nearly 80% of the cases. During the 30 days of mask wear, headaches occurred one to four times.30
Kim et al evaluated the effects of N95 masks on lung function and heart rate while performing low-tomoderate levels of activities. The results of this study showed good tolerance to the mask and recommended the daily use of MNP as a general means of protection.30
Psychological and Behavioural Modifications
Human behaviour is often determined by subjective experiences, that is most directly related to how people comprehend various life situations. The selfdetermination theory31 reports three fundamental needs for adequate well-being: autonomy, psychological relatedness, and competence. These needs may determine the attitude and compliance towards mask-wearing. Autonomy, or the ability to possess and exhibit free will and control over one’s actions, is considered one of the most basic psychological needs, and when these are hampered, it may lead to some level of discomfort psychologically.32
Long-term use of face masks compromises basic humanto-human connectivity through facial expression, and self-identity is somewhat obscured. These dehumanizing movements erase the uniqueness and individuality of both the person wearing the facemask and the connected person.33 Social connections and relationships are fundamental human needs that are innately inherited by all people, and a lack of human-to-human connections is associated with poor mental and physical health.34 Similarly, another research conducted to assess the attitude towards maskwearing reported that men who firmly believed they should be tough were likely to develop negative feelings towards wearing a mask and lacked the intention to wear a face mask regularly.35
Environmental Challenges due to Improper Mask Disposal
Accumulation of plastic wastes has become a grave threat to the ecosystem and researchers predict a twotimes increase in the plastic burden by 2030. With the ongoing Covid pandemic, the average monthly usage of 129 billion face masks and 65 billion gloves is estimated to ensure the safety of citizens worldwide. Also, surgical masks and gloves mustn’t be worn for extended hours and they should be adequately discarded to avoid crosscontamination.
The universally recommended N95 masks are made of plastics such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). These masks will break down into smaller microplastic fragments. The improper disposal of facemasks is contributing to public littering in several locations. Public littering with PPE and plastics can cause blockage in the sewage system in towns and can harm water percolation within the soil. Plastic contaminants may also reach out and accumulate into the other environmental compartments and can reduce the quality of soil and water that can cause adverse effects on the ecosystem. Also, plastic wastes piled up near lakes, ponds, and other water bodies may act as breeding grounds for mosquitoes that are common carriers for zoonotic diseases, which can also be a threat to public health.36
Recommendations to Mitigate the Effects of Prolonged Face Mask Use:
• The public is asked to take appropriate breaks from continuous mask use, with 15 minutes off following every two hours is recommended. Furthermore, avoiding facial make-up and washing the face with a gentle, fragrance-free, non-comedogenic cleanser in the morning and evening is suggested.37
• Ear savers for the ear straps to rest on them instead of resting directly on the ears were suggested for those suffering from rashes behind the ears.38
• Encourage people to use cloth masks daily to avoid skin reactions caused by face masks. When cloth masks are widely used in public places, they may help to reduce the spread of the virus.39
• Long term use of the mask is not recommended for children under the age of two or individuals with breathing difficulties, or otherwise unable to remove the mask without assistance.40
• Proper disposal of facemask and other protective material is advised since protective effect severely compromised by their inappropriate.
Conclusion
The rapid spread of infection and fatality of the disease has brought medical facilities to the verge of collapse in many countries. Various measures have been advised to prevent the transmission of infection between communities, out of which face masks are considered the primary step to prevent and contain the disease spread. Along with the use of mouth masks, various medical complications and environmental challenges have been reported lately due to the long-term overuse and improper disposal. It is, therefore, necessary to institute proper guidelines and recommendations for the use of face masks to prevent future complications.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Supporting File
References
1. Kondody RT, Sana S, Reddy R, Fatima A, Bangi SL. Coronavirus disease 2019-Challenges today and tomorrow in orthodontic practice: A review. Turk J Orthod 2021;34(1):61-67.
2. WH Organization. Statement on the second meeting of the international health regulations 2005 emergency committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01 -2020.
3. Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR. The possible immunological pathways for the variable Immunopathogenesis of COVID-19 infections among healthy adults, elderly, and children. Electron J Gen Med 2020;17:202.
4. Li T, Liu Y, Li M, Qian X, Dai SY. Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study. PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0237691.
5. Varma SR. Masks and respirators, selection criteria for periodontal therapy: Challenges for a periodontist during COVID-19. J Int Oral Health 2020;12:64-8.
6. Kisielinski K, Giboni P, Prescher A, Klosterhalfen B, Graessel D, Funken S, et al. Is a mask that covers the mouth and nose free from undesirable side effects in everyday use and free of potential hazards? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;20;18(8):4344.
7. Ewig S, Gatermann S, Lemmen S. Die maskierte Gesellschaft. Pneumologie. 2020;74(7):405-408.
8. Lim EC, Seet RC, Lee KH, Wilder-Smith EP, Chuah BY, Ong BK. Headaches and the N95 face-mask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurol Scand 2006;113(3):199-202.
9. Foo C, Anthony TJ Goon, Yung-Hian Leow, CheeLeok Goh. Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment against severe acute respiratory syndrome- a descriptive study in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:291-294.
10. Lan J, Song Z, Miao X, Li H, Li Y, Dong L, et al. Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82(5):1215-1216.
11. Essa WK, Yasin SA, Saeed IA, Ali GAM. Nanofiber-based face masks and respirators as COVID-19 protection: A review. Membranes (Basel) 2021;11(4):250.
12. Forouzandeh P, O’Dowd K, Pillai SC. Face masks and respirators in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of the standards and testing methods. Saf Sci 2021;133:104995.
13. Matuschek C, Moll F, Fangerau H, Fischer JC, Zänker K, van Griensven M, et al. Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis. Eur J Med Res 2020;25(1):1-8.
14. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH Guide to the Selection and Use of Particulate Respirators. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) NIOSH publication number 96-101, 1996. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-101/default. html. Accessed 21 November 2020.
15. CEN, E., 2001. 149: 2001 norm: Respiratory protective devices-Filtering half masks to protect against particles-Requirements, testing, marking. European Committee for Standardization. Available from: https://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail? pid=0000000 00030178264. Accessed 21 November 2020.
16. Dry S, Leach M. Epidemic narratives. In: Dry S, Leach M, editors.Epidemics: “Science, Governance, and Social Justice”. London, Washington: Routledge; 2010. pp. 1–21
17. World Health Organization. Mask use in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 1 December 2020. World Health Organization; 2020.
18. Camargo MC, Martinez-Silveira MS, Lima AA, Bastos BP, Santos DLD, Mota SEC, et al. Effectiveness of the use of non-woven face mask to prevent coronavirus infections in the general population: a rapid systematic review. Cien Saude Colet 2020;25(9):3365-3376.
19. Liang M, Gao L, Cheng C, Zhou Q, Uy JP, Heiner K, et al. Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;36:101751.
20. MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients. Int J Nurs Stud 2020;108:103629.
21. Kwan RYC, Lee PH, Cheung DSK, Lam SC. Face mask wearing behaviors, depressive symptoms, and health beliefs among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:590936.
22. Hemmer CJ, Hufert F, Siewert S, Reisinger E. Protection from COVID-19: The efficacy of face masks. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2021;5:118.
23. Tran TQ, Mostafa EM, Tawfik GM, Soliman M, Mahabir S, Mahabir R, et al. Efficacy of face masks against respiratory infectious diseases: a systematic review and network analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials. J Breath Res 2021;13:15.
24. Wang Y, Tian H, Zhang L, Zhang M, Guo D, Wu W, et al. Reduction of secondary transmission of SARSCoV-2 in households by face mask use, disinfection and social distancing: a cohort study in Beijing, China. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(5):e002794.
25. Doung-Ngern P, Suphanchaimat R, Panjangampatthana A, Janekrongtham C, Ruampoom D, Daochaeng N, et al. Case-control study of use of personal protective measures and risk for SARS-CoV 2 infection, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26(11):2607-2616.
26. Kenney WL, Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012.
27. Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A, Babb T, Barreiro E, Dres M, et al. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J 2019;53(6):1801214.
28. Kao TW, Huang KC, Huang YL, Tsai TJ, Hsieh BS, Wu MS. The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:624–8.
29. Ong J, Bharatendu C, Goh Y, Tang J, Sooi K, Tan Y. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment – a cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020; 60(5):864- 877.
30. Kim JH, Benson SM, Roberge RJ. Pulmonary and heart rate responses to wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Am J Infect Control 2013;41(1):24–7.
31. Roberge RJ, Kim JH, Powell JB. N95 respirator use during advanced pregnancy. Am J Infect Control 2014;42(10):1097–100.
32. Brehm SS, Brehm JW. Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1981.
33. Thoits PA. Stress and health: major findings and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51(Suppl):S41–53.
34. Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol 2004;59:676–84.
35. Palmer CL, Peterson RD. Toxic mask-ulinity: the link between masculine toughness and affective reactions to mask wearing in the COVID-19 era. Politics Gender 2020;1-8.
36. Capraro V, Barcelo H. The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.05467
37. Desai SR, Kovarik C, Brod B, James W, Fitzgerald ME, Preston A, et al. COVID-19 and personal protective equipment: Treatment and prevention of skin conditions related to the occupational use of personal protective equipment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;83(2):675-677.
38. Scheid JL, Lupien SP, Ford GS, West SL. Commentary: physiological and psychological impact of face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(18):6655.
39. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-ncov/ prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-coverguidance. html. Published February 11, 2020. Accessed July 28, 2020
40. Wang MW, Zhou MY, Ji GH. Mask crisis during the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020;24:3397-3399.